Military officials are in discussion with the White House over potentially sharp new cuts to America’s nuclear force.

Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the nation’s top military leader, says discussions are still preliminary and maintaining the current posture is still a possibility.

However, according to a recent Associated Press report, the administration is closely considering reducing the number of America’s deployed weapons by 80 percent! America’s nuclear arsenal is now down to 1,550 deployed strategic warheads. In 2002, America had almost 8,000 nuclear warheads deployed.

If the cuts are adopted, America would have fewer deployed weapons than China.

The Associated Press said General Dempsey declined to comment on the 80 percent figure and noted that the administration is considering at least three other options for lower numbers.

There are several probable reasons, or combinations of reasons, the administration is considering such drastic action.

The administration may be trying to breathe fresh life into President Obama’s failed “reset” with Russia. The massive arms reduction may be seen as a way to once again “extend the hand of friendship” to convince Russia of America’s good intentions.

The administration may legitimately believe that reducing the U.S.’s nuclear deterrent makes America safer from its enemies.

The administration may also believe that it gives the United States more credibility in the eyes of the international community as it pressures Iran to give up its nuclear weapons ambitions.

Lastly, economic constraints may be finally forcing the government to take more drastic measures to control the deficit. America’s military budget, which is by far the largest in the world, is sure to feel the brunt of America’s deteriorating economy.

Regardless of the reason, the outcome is largely the same. America’s military—the pride of its power—may soon be facing unprecedented cuts.