A few weeks ago I was sitting in the lounge of the King George Hotel in beautiful George in South Africa’s Western Cape province. Memories of South Africa’s big moment of the year, the hosting of the soccer World Cup, were already fading. The country had returned to dealing—or rather not dealing, in many respects—with its ongoing challenges.

Looking out across the rugged Outeniqua Mountains, all appeared calm and peaceful, just as it did when I first took in this view back in 1994. But then, as now, the view belies the reality. South Africa is far from being “the rainbow nation at peace with itself,” as touted by Nelson Mandela shortly after he gained the nation’s presidency in 1995—a country where the peace in society matches the beauty of the handiwork of the Creator who carved out its breathtaking countryside.

After spending a few days in the picturesque tourist resort of George, we landed in Cape Town, its renowned Table Mountain dominating the hinterland, the waters of the famous harbor glistening in spring sunshine.

The first time I took in this view was also in 1994. I expected to see change, and that’s exactly what I saw. The most obvious change that is apparent upon returning to South Africa after over a decade and a half’s absence is the prominence of African blacks in positions of service previously held by whites. This is the result of a deliberate policy of the African National Congress (anc)-dominated government to displace whites with blacks based on racial preference rather than any real ability to perform the job. The result has been an obvious reduction in the efficiency of the delivery of service.

Though those whose minds have been perverted by the inane political correctness of the age will have trouble handling that statement of fact, nevertheless it is the reality. There’s no political correctness in today’s South Africa—just a blatant effort of the leadership of the majority ethnic population to take from those who were responsible for handing them a society that had brought them from millennia of rank tribalism to the sophistication of a civilized society in barely a couple of centuries.

Any transition of power from a dominant, sophisticated, highly developed culture to a lesser developed culture would ordinarily take a good deal of time and effort, and full cooperation between the parties involved. This has not been the case with South Africa. The old government simply wanted to divest itself of the largest problem in its “too hard” basket, for the right price. The new government came in with an agenda: Displace whites from their perch and take over the wealth of the land, distributing it to privileged blacks who had been the most vocal and active in resisting white rule.

In South Africa, the result has been much the same as it has been in other ex-colonial African nations: The Big Men (and women) get the lion’s share of the wealth, the poor continue to rot in their festering ghettos.

A year after the handover of the country by President De Klerk to the anc-dominated government, I stood only a few yards away from Nelson Mandela in the press gallery on the lawns in front of the fine old colonial Union Building in Pretoria. The politicians who had helped give away a country that had been gifted by God to the modern descendants of the ancient nation of Israel sat behind him. Before Mandela, the adoring, clamoring crowd amassed on the lawn. The occasion was the first anniversary of the handover of the country, “Freedom Day” as it has come to be labeled.

As I looked into the eyes of Mandela, the former terrorist, one year into his presidency of the great country of South Africa, the words of my editor in chief rang loud in my ears. “South Africa,” he said to me as we discussed just what 1994 portended for the West, “is the first of the Anglo-Saxon nations to give away its God-given birthright.”

Returning to this once richly blessed country a decade and a half later, I see the results of that fatal decision of the de Klerk government. The shanty towns in Cape Town that were a new blight on the country in the mid-’90s are now entrenched components of the urban scene. They are larger and continue to extend, month by month, even as illegal immigrants continue to pour across the nation’s ill-secured borders to the north. Their number adds to an already endemic social problem in South Africa: the rapidly swelling ranks of the unemployed. This in a country that already has the staggering figure of 37 percent general unemployment and 60 percent youth unemployment. That latter figure is now leading to spontaneous youth riots in various communities.

Mandela’s electoral promises of a home for every black remain largely unfulfilled even as a significant class of black nouveau riche has arisen attached to the government, the bureaucracy and to a certain extent business and commerce. This is the result of a combination of deeply entrenched corruption, nepotism and a “jobs for the boys” mentality that has seen ill-qualified lackeys of the anc granted fat-salaried “jobs.” These positions often amount to nothing more than an official title with the trappings of office and a nice paycheck attached to hollow job descriptions demanding little or no accountability. This situation has not been helped by a white commercial class that has toadied to the government for the favor it needs in order to continue producing corporate profits.

The result is rampant corruption. But the South African government continues to window dress under the delusion that it can aspire to global power status.

This past week, South Africa’s president, Jacob Zuma, trotted out a list of platitudes designed to mask the reality of the systemic problems that have plagued the country since the de Klerk government handed control to the anc/South African Communist Party (sacp) cabal 17 years ago.

Last week the Economist reported, “President Jacob Zuma’s government announced a ‘new growth path’ this week, with the aim of creating 5 million jobs over the next 10 years. Since the official unemployment rate stands at over 25 percent—and at almost 37 percent if those too discouraged to go on looking for a job are included—this should indeed be a priority.

“Sadly, however, there is not much new in the government’s plan. It amounts to little more than a long list of worthy suggestions (less corruption, more efficiency, greater cooperation with unions and so on). If conditions were right this might do it. But they are not” (October 29).

On the foreign-policy front, the Zuma government is seeking to align with the so-called bric emerging economies—Brazil, Russia, India and China. Zuma has visited each of these countries this year in efforts to raise inward investment in South Africa.

Two months ago, President Zuma visited Beijing and signed a comprehensive strategic partnership with China, the latest in a number of efforts by the South African government to cozy up to other emerging economic powers and thus increase Pretoria’s prestige as a global geopolitical player. However, as Stratfor recently reported, “While such partnerships can help bring much-needed investment and technical expertise into the country, South Africa’s domestic challenges, such as unemployment, public sector strikes and widespread poverty, will need to be addressed before it can credibly rise as a regional power with global influence, and some of the potential partnerships with China could even exacerbate existing problems” (August 24).

The point for the Zuma government to recognize here is that any nation that invests in the development of South African resources will have only its own national interest at heart. Distracted by deeply entrenched social problems, and having lost much of the strong military edge that South Africa once possessed before the anc/sacp took over in 1994, more dominant powers have little to fear in terms of retribution for pillaging the nation’s wealth. As Strafor noted, a “potential influx of Chinese laborers displacing their South African counterparts, as has been the case elsewhere in Africa, would compound Pretoria’s existing employment problems” (ibid.).

South Africa faces a difficult choice. To survive it must market its much-desired natural resources. The risk is that it will be taken advantage of by stronger and more resilient economies such as China and the increasingly powerful European Union, especially its lead nation, Germany. These two giant competing yet so interdependent markets are eying South Africa’s raw materials as they seek to feed their resource-hungry industries. These are the two great “marts” prophesied in Isaiah 23. Between them they hold the major portion of the bargaining chips for South Africa’s mineral wealth.

Any aspiration by South Africa to mix with the mighty as a global player will continue to be frustrated by the ineptness of its self-serving political class which, rather than advancing the lot of its native population, appears rather to be retrogressing in the delivery of much-needed social services. As in so many other African nations, it seems the cult of entitlement has subsumed any sense of public responsibility in South Africa’s post-apartheid ruling class.

Storm clouds are gathering over the rainbow nation. The risk is that the tensions between the 4 percent of the population that pay taxes and the rest will become so great that South African society will erupt in internecine strife. In the meantime, those of the birthright people who remain, whose leaders sold their nation for a bowl of pottage, maintain a precarious foothold, mostly in the Western Cape province.

Whether it is obvious or not to the casual observer, the reality is that South Africa is a classic demonstration of that which happens to a people who forget their God. He simply allows them, in their rebellion, to flush their God-given birthright down the drain!

In the great prophecy to the Israelites, the Eternal God declared, “[I]f thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes … all these curses shall come upon thee …. The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low. … [H]e shalt be the head, and thou shalt be the tail” (Deuteronomy 28:15, 43-44).

Indeed, parodying the words from the title of Alan Paton’s famous novel, it’s the birthright people of the “beloved country” who should indeed cry for the beloved country! Cry tears of repentance for turning their back on their Maker, the giver of every good and perfect gift, and selling their very birthright to the stranger, who has now gotten up high above them. For indeed they, the birthright people, have become the tail, and he, the stranger, the head.